So, 50% to the British investment fund Hipgnosis. On social media, a conspiracy theorist who goes by the nickname An0maly outlined the theory in helpful detail, beginning with the observation that, in January 2021, Young reportedly sold half of his catalog to a UK-based investment fund called Hipgnosis, for around $150 million. Others did not explicitly state that Pfizer itself owned some or all of Young’s catalogue, but made suggest that the company had dominion over him, by way of Serie from connectionsand that therefore Young’s opposition to Rogan and his criticism of vaccine misinformation should be dismissed as the result of corruption and self-compromise, rather than principled stance. of Young’s music or, through a chain of connections, dominated the rock star and influenced, or even mandated, his pro-vaccination stance.įor example, some social network users aware to memes with the caption, “When you realize Neil Young’s music catalog is owned by Pfizer”: In the midst of that controversy, vaccine skeptics and COVID-19 conspiracy theorists shared a ridiculous conspiracy theory that claimed that the pharmaceutical company Pfizer, which produces a widely used COVID-19 vaccine, owned the rights to the catalog. In response, Spotify remote Young’s back catalog from his library, instead severing ties with Rogan. On January 24, Young wrote that he wanted his music removed from the streaming platform Spotify, unless the company terminated its deal to host the Joe Rogan podcast, which has on several occasions provided a forum for potentially damaging misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines. In early 2022, folk-rock legend Neil Young became the target of a ridiculous conspiracy theory after speaking out against misinformation related to COVID-19.

Neil young spotify hipgnosis